Conservatives often point to badly designed governmental systems as evidence that government in itself is by necessity a bad thing and that some relatively unregulated form of capitalism works better. These conservative critics are certainly correct that capitalism is very far from the worst possible system that we could create. They are also correct that there many possible systems that would use government to do even more terrible things than generally occur under laissez-faire. However, it is a giant leap from this position to the notion that no systems can use government to benefit people, or indeed the position that no system can use government to serve the interests of people better than capitalism. It would be far more reasonable to say that we should be wary of the many forms of government that are ineffective even as we embrace evidence-based systems of governance that actually function to benefit people. ... Read more

Category:
|
Proponents of economically conservative philosophies like libertarianism (sometimes caled neoliberalism) or traditional conservatism are responsible for the existence of many dangerous myths. This FAQ describes and debunks some of them.
It is important to note that libertarianism is not the same as the authoritarian "neoconservative" philosophy that has held considerable sway in the Republican Party for several decades. Unlike libertarians (at least in theory), neoconservatives (at least in practice) favor corporate welfare and other government benefits for the wealthy. Otherwise, however, with respect to economic issues, the interests of the two groups are quite similar, and unfortunately, their philosophies have had a significant influence on the past few decades of United States government rhetoric and policy. ... Read more

Category:
|